The short answer
SafeLaunch maps every finding to the exact provision of 138 laws, then writes the fix three ways: a before-and-after code change, a prompt tailored to your AI builder (Lovable, Cursor, Claude Code, Bolt, v0, Replit or Windsurf) with "done when" acceptance checks, and a master prompt that applies every fix in order of severity. A re-check confirms what is no longer detected.
Key takeaways
- A finding is only useful if someone can act on it. Every SafeLaunch finding carries the law, the evidence, the severity and the fix.
- Prompts are tailored to the builder SafeLaunch detects in your project, using its conventions: Cursor's @file mentions, Lovable's keep-the-design instruction, Claude Code's minimal diff and checks.
- Every prompt ends with 'Done when' acceptance checks, so you and the model know when the fix is complete.
- A master fix prompt walks through every finding from critical to low, one change at a time.
- Launch Fix includes one free re-check within 30 days; findings that disappear are reported as 'no longer detected', not as certified fixes.
On this page
01
Why do compliance reports usually fail to get fixed?
Traditional compliance output is written for lawyers: 'Ensure processing of personal data is transparent in accordance with Article 13.' It's accurate and not actionable. A founder working in Lovable or Cursor has to translate it into a code change, guess which file to edit and hope nothing else breaks.
AI builders are good at making changes when the instruction is precise. They're poor at deciding what the law requires. SafeLaunch splits the work along that line: the rulebook decides what's required and where, and the builder makes the change.
02
How do 138 laws become a single finding?
The SafeLaunch rulebook breaks each of 138 laws and standards into the specific requirements a website or app must meet, and ties each one to its provision. When one problem breaks several laws, it becomes one finding with several citations, not a dozen duplicates.
| Market | Provision cited for 'Tracker loads before consent' |
|---|---|
| European Union | ePrivacy Directive Art. 5(3); GDPR Art. 6(1)(a) & 7 |
| United Kingdom | PECR Reg. 6 (as amended by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025); UK GDPR Art. 7 |
| Switzerland | TCA Art. 45c; revFADP Art. 6 |
| California | CCPA §1798.120 & §1798.135 (opt-out of sharing; honour GPC) |
| Brazil | LGPD Art. 7–8 |
| India | DPDP Act 2023 §6 |
Each finding records the evidence (the page, or the file and line), the severity, how confident the analysis is and the plain-language action. The rulebook is versioned, and every report names the version it used. See the rulebook and changelog.
03
How does a finding become a copy-paste prompt?
SafeLaunch detects which builder made your project from the files it leaves behind (Lovable, Cursor and Windsurf rule files, Replit configuration, CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, and package metadata) and shapes every prompt for it. You can switch to any other builder in the report.
| Builder | How the prompt is shaped | Where to paste it |
|---|---|---|
| Lovable | Asks for the change without altering anything unrelated, keeping the current design | The Lovable chat (review the plan in Chat mode first) |
| Cursor | Minimal diff, no unrelated files; files referenced as @path | Agent mode (Cmd/Ctrl+I) |
| Claude Code | Read the relevant files first, keep the diff minimal, run the project's checks | Run claude in the project folder |
| Bolt | Minimal diff with the file named | The Bolt prompt box |
| v0 | Minimal diff with the file named | The v0 chat for the project |
| Replit | Minimal diff with the file named | Replit Agent |
| Windsurf | Minimal diff with the file named | Cascade in Write mode |
Here is what a single finding's prompt looks like for Lovable:
Make this change without altering anything unrelated, and keep the current design.
Load Google Analytics and the Meta Pixel only after the visitor accepts the
matching cookie category. Remove the tags hard-coded in index.html, and
initialise them from the consent banner's "analytics" and "marketing"
callbacks. Put a "Reject all" button next to "Accept all" on the first layer
of the banner, with equal prominence.
Start in the file index.html.
Done when:
- With no choice made, no analytics or advertising request is sent and no
tracking cookie is set.
- After clicking Reject, no analytics or advertising tracker loads.
- A SafeLaunch scan of the next version no longer reports "Advertising
tracker loads before consent".04
What is the master fix prompt?
Fixing findings one by one is safest for a large product. For a typical launch, Launch Fix also writes a master fix prompt: every finding, sorted from critical to low, each with its action and first acceptance check. It tells the builder to work one change at a time, report what it changed, and list anything it couldn't complete.
Fix the compliance gaps in this repository found by a SafeLaunch audit of
acme.app. Work in order, one commit per fix, and run the project's checks
after each.
1. [CRITICAL] Database table "profiles" readable by anyone (supabase/migrations)
Enable row-level security on profiles and allow each user to read and
update only their own row.
Done when: an anonymous request and a different signed-in user both
receive no rows from profiles.
2. [HIGH] Advertising tracker loads before consent (index.html)
…
Finally, list anything you couldn't complete and why. Then I'll re-run
SafeLaunch on the new version.Alongside the prompts, Launch Fix includes the before-and-after code for each finding and a patch file you can apply directly with Git, for teams who prefer to review a diff rather than run an agent.
05
What about fixes that aren't code?
Many obligations are documents, not features. Launch Fix drafts them from the evidence found in your product, so they describe what you actually do:
- Privacy notice, cookie notice and terms, written for your product, its vendors and its markets.
- Record of processing activities and the list of vendor data-processing agreements to sign.
- Breach response plan with each market's notification deadlines.
- Retention schedule and impact assessment screening.
- Registrations and representatives you may need to appoint in some markets.
- Marketing email kit, AI use policy, payment-page script inventory and an accessibility statement.
- For mobile apps, draft App Store and Google Play privacy answers.
06
How do you know the fix worked?
- 01
Apply the fixes
Paste the prompts or apply the patch, then review the change like any other pull request.
- 02
Re-check the new version
Launch Fix includes one free re-check within 30 days; further re-checks are $29. With the GitHub App, you can scan any connected repository in one click.
- 03
Compare by rule, not by number
The re-check matches findings by the rule behind them, so a resolved issue shows as 'no longer detected' and anything new is flagged as new. 'No longer detected' means the check now passes, not that a lawyer has certified the fix.
- 04
Sign off the exact version
Code reports can be signed off for one exact Git commit or uploaded file hash, against a named rulebook version, with an Ed25519-signed, append-only record anyone can verify.
138
laws mapped to provisions
7
builders with tailored prompts
1
free re-check with Launch Fix
$149
Launch Fix, one-time
Start with a free scan to see your score and top problems, or browse a complete sample report first. Compare plans on the pricing page.
One free fix in your inbox each week
A new copy-paste prompt for Lovable, Cursor or Claude Code every week, with the rule behind it and how to check it worked. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.
By signing up you agree to get this weekly email. We send it with Kit, and you can unsubscribe at any time. What we share with Kit is in our privacy notice.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions.
Sources and further reading
- GDPR Article 13: information to be provided
- GDPR Article 25: data protection by design and by default
- GDPR Article 32: security of processing
- OWASP Top 10
- W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2
This article is general information, not legal advice. SafeLaunch is automated software, not a law firm; a report records what was checked on one version and is not a certificate of compliance. Read the disclaimer.
From the founder
SafeLaunch is built by Raghav R Handa, a lawyer-turned-builder in New Delhi. He writes about this topic in plain English:
See what SafeLaunch finds on your product.
Paste a link and get your score, the most serious problems and what already passes, in about a minute.
Keep reading